Pros: Multiple Libraries, RAW Support, Organizes PhotosĬons: Price, limited Platforms, Unreliable, Difficult to use Apple PhotosĪpple at one point dominated the photo organizer market with their iPhoto product. But the biggest negative is there is a steep learning curve to get started using this software. The catalog files are too easy to corrupt, and it is expensive. It’s not the most reliable software…move photos around outside its interface and it does not follow the moves. However, it is only available for Windows and Mac. Lightroom imports photos from camera cards, supports RAW adjustments, tags images, and allows me to group photos in folders on my computer. It supports multiple Libraries, which is a nice feature, though not one of my criteria. Let’s look at some candidates though: Adobe LightroomĪdobe’s Lightroom product is first and foremost designed for professional photographers. As we will see, this puts me in a difficult position because, thus far, I have found nothing that meets all these needs. Third, any software I recommend must be reliable and work on the devices my clients use. The software should let me group, tag, and search for photos. The second criteria is it must organize I need to be able to import photos form camera cards and mobile devices. My photos must remain in my possession and accessible to me. I think the first criteria is that a photo manager must leave me in control. How can I select and choose a software package to recommend? I need some criteria against which to evaluate a product. If Google Photos is the only place all my photos exist, do they really exist? I have no control over Google so what is to keep them from cutting off my access to my photos some day because they decide they can’t make money off my photos? So, for all the polish and ease of sharing photos, I cannot recommend this service to anyone. More disturbing is that I now must trust that Google will not pull the rug out from me. Google hopes to analyze our photos and derive some economically useful data from the photos. I figure that in essence our cameras have become Google’s eyes in the real world. Back of the envelope calculation suggests this would cost Google about $4-5/year to store. I may have a paltry 14GB of images, but my wife is closing on 250GB. Okay, if you were suspicious about how Google made money from Picasa, how are they going to make money from the online service? Their overhead just skyrocketed. Simply upload all your photos to Google and they will be available via the Google Photos website or in the apps available for iOS or Android. Google would like you to move to their online service Google Photos. So, what is a user to do? Picasa to Google Photos: Would We Recommend? However, it was a stunning surprise for those of us who depended on the not-too-much nonsense,” get right down to work features” of Picasa. It certainly wasn’t a surprise to everyone that wondered how Google would make money off offering the best photo management tool for free. Tick " Let people I share with contribute photos".When Google announced that they were discontinuing Picasa, it wasn’t really a surprise to those of us that understand that any of the Google services may disappear at any time with little notice.Enter the email address of the Google account that you want to give upload permissions to, and any message that you want to send them.,.If your account does not have a Google+ Profile, then clicking the Share button opens the basic Picasa-web-sharing invitation. View the individual album that you want to allow someone else to add photos to.Ĭlick the Share button in the right-hand panel. (See Stop being automatically redirected from PWA to Google+ Photos if you have difficulty staying in Picasa-web-albums.) Log in to Picasa-web-albums using the Google account that owns the photo-albums and other related things (eg blogger administration rights), and which you want to be the main owner/administrator of your photos. How to let another Google account add photos to one of your Picasa-web-albums. You cannot transfer ownership to one person now, and to another person in a year's time (which is quite different to the way you can easily transfer other aspects of your blog to a new owners).Īnd Google also provide a way for an account owner to let another Google account add photos to the owners albums. Google now provide a tool to transfer Picasa-web albums from one account to another - but only once ever in the life-time of the album. Previously I've described Picasa desktop vs Picasa-web-albums, and noted that you can upload pictures to your PWA folders using either of the two pieces of software.Įach album and folder in Picasa-web-albums belongs to one Google account (which may or may not have an associated Google+ account).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |